Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 16:04:33 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: John Marino <dragonflybsd@marino.st>, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <testing@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Need help fixing failing locale tests Message-ID: <564882E1.5050404@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20151115130009.GC93991@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <CAG=rPVc1t2q_MR99iyWYfy4xrCy==KA1yT=EAaa2twiHoC=zcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=rPVfK6ZyWJhtuBihmj%2BWNp94auCJ3kDqoQm-ygXNpiLeatA@mail.gmail.com> <69242BD8-9010-47F0-9706-BE206376ECEA@gmail.com> <289892B6-EACE-4BDA-B838-D3DC750319DE@gmail.com> <56482FA9.2010803@marino.st> <56487973.5070803@freebsd.org> <20151115124656.GB93991@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <564880FA.5000009@freebsd.org> <20151115130009.GC93991@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MIqWb4iilpE53FpgbvoFfv3eroo7aJSsT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 15.11.2015 16:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 03:56:26PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: >> On 15.11.2015 15:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 03:24:19PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: >>>> On 15.11.2015 10:09, John Marino wrote: >>>> ISO8859-1 locales are legacy even if obsoleted in modern world (I ag= ree >>>> with that). Lots of ports (even at configure stage!) have checks for= >>>> them. Since we generate locales from CLDR now, it will be no cost to= >>>> bring all 8859-1 back to not violate POLA and not fix every failing = port. >>>> >>> Exp-run have been made and no ports were failing with the removed loc= ales. >> >> There is soft-fail, configure just marks that locales are not supporte= d >> and use "C". Sorry I don't remember port names where I saw it right no= w >> and don't have a time to search for them right now too. Soft-fails (li= ke >> in tcl with nl_langinfo) are almost impossible to detect excepting >> specific situation happens or source code inspection. Do we ever need >> them when there is no harm to keep 8859-1 locales? >=20 > Is it ok if I readd those locales as aliases on 8859-15? It is hacking solution leads to wrong collating order and character classes. It is better to generate true 8859-1 just in the same way you already do for 8859-15. BTW, I can't check right now, but in case 8859-5 is removed too, it is better to restore it, it was used in Suns as their standard Russian encoding. --=20 http://ache.vniz.net/ --MIqWb4iilpE53FpgbvoFfv3eroo7aJSsT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWSILhAAoJEKUckv0MjfbKEfMIAIW+80MDARSu4Sx8eL1Sn9Et PW351DbHU+hAILHkOZ9yCQa1OKRh981JmUNCi5ocyphuBf303BOgUfHyB5L1h2rf hQWFe78s+tPu1s1P3VlrVxZ5miakhTdPpyVfZDIqa3HO2jw94hxFAW96+JTINm+a +aWVlIRQk3+Q2qqGaIVTxloEeFRmRZPnNYWCFrXynftK8IIK3reUc53IzZ1AoJBP ZoodS1hQ6dsACRjwItoX8M5vY096vJ58QiZ4G+LyupoTBvJQY23S0CyEhRtNnMPb JldOMfofHRkoYrIgDwdgagBpl/P9+A41JynDnWm1QdC0/PkjBrgTaS5pqNX4IAs= =Bnpx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MIqWb4iilpE53FpgbvoFfv3eroo7aJSsT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?564882E1.5050404>