Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 18:39:24 -0500 From: Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software support <software@kew.com> To: "Michael V. Harding" <mvh@netcom.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'Code Freeze' Message-ID: <35105B2C.F7ECD15D@kew.com> References: <199803181311.FAA02549@netcom1.netcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael V. Harding wrote:
> I'll have to agree with the below - my experience has been that the
> CDs are the LEAST stable releases.
I agree. I only use the 2.2.5 CD-ROM for the ports disc.
> There always seems to be some ugly bug discovered
> within a month of the CD going to press
This is very true. It occurred to me at one point suggest that another point
be added to the 2.2.5 release (2.2.5.1) to fix all the minor problems. But
that should be the function of the 2.2.? level.
Put another way, why did the disk slice code have to go onto -stable? How did
it "improve" the stable environment?
--
Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com
Telephone: 617-279-9812
"Never test for a bug you don't know how to fix." - QA manager
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35105B2C.F7ECD15D>