Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:41:59 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: NTFS in GENERIC: opt-in or opt-out? Message-ID: <1232350919.2322.3.camel@P2120.somewherefaraway.com> In-Reply-To: <49742ADA.5080509@FreeBSD.org> References: <49742ADA.5080509@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 23:25 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, > > I am reviewing differences between amd64 and i386 GENERIC kernels and > noticed that for some unclear reason we ship amd64 GENERIC with NTFS > module compiled in, while i386 without it. IMHO both should match. The > question is whether NTFS should be i386 way (opt in) or amd64 way (opt the Windows file system? I would use opt-in as most people will not need it. Erich > out) in GENERIC? What do people think? > > -Maxim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1232350919.2322.3.camel>