Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:00:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Me Uh, K." <pram512@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Fwd: Re: dump(8) Insecurity/Misconfiguration Message-ID: <19990927220012.20408.rocketmail@web1006.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[I meant to send this to the list earlier today, but like an idiot sent it to the very nice Rodney W. Grimes (freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net), who was kind enough to reply - which I'm also posting to the list] Just a side question, mostly-off topic - [SNIP] > For example, an Internet service provider is allowed > to install this program on their systems and permit > clients to use SSH to connect; however, actively > distributing SSH to clients for the purpose of > providing added value requires separate licensing. Would it be all right to distribute: A) at the customer's request? B) if there are no additional charges for the SSH? (the actual value of the service goes up, but most ISP customers don't even use telnet for anything other than uploading thier webpages - yet it still comes with most ISP software bundles, and the ISP doesn't charge any additional fees for the ability, or for the software- course, last I checked, it's always been a free program, anyway) I know we're not lawyers here, and that answers are only theoretical interpretations, ect. -mia k. (wishing she'd stop mailing busy people her relatively irrelevant questions, and wondering what she's doing subscribed to Security when she can't figure out who her replies are going to ;) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990927220012.20408.rocketmail>