Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:03:48 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-04:01.mksnap_ffs Message-ID: <20040203010348.GA93989@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200402030029.i130Ts8F014698@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <200401301607.i0UG7CIl082205@freefall.freebsd.org> <200402030029.i130Ts8F014698@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:29:54PM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <200401301607.i0UG7CIl082205@freefall.freebsd.org>, FreeBSD=20 > Security > Advisories writes: > > Branch Revisi= on > > Path > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > > RELENG_5_1 > > src/sbin/mksnap_ffs/mksnap_ffs.c 1.2.2= .1 > > src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.50.2.= 14 > > RELENG_5_2 > > src/sbin/mksnap_ffs/mksnap_ffs.c 1.5.2= .1 > > src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.56.2= .3 > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- >=20 > Would it be worth our while to list the revision in -CURRENT too (e.g. 1.= 7)? >=20 > Just a thought. It's explicitly stated on the Security webpage that -CURRENT isn't supported by security advisories. Kris --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAHvN0Wry0BWjoQKURAlErAJ940ca/O3QLo6W0SbQPUQh3OWsyPgCg4ZCw RPDVNMfyBCBIS3tEosn169g= =DBsU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040203010348.GA93989>