Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:15:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234413] quotactl() returns wrong error Message-ID: <bug-234413-227-U1PmmoUbby@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-234413-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234413 --- Comment #5 from Emrion <kmachine@free.fr> --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #4) I wrote it in my first post (sorry for the double post by the way): it's Samba which don't handle the error returned by 12.0-RELEASE (ENOENT) and flood tty0 with error messages. There is at least two workarounds to avoid these errors. Details here: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/samba-quota-errors-logged.68832/ My point is that I don't think it's normal that quotactl() returns ENOENT even if the quota system is now implemented on zfs. I and many people don't use quota. So, in this case, what should be the correct error? Samba handles ENOTSUP and EINVAL errors, not ENOENT. If ENOENT is definitively the suitable error for this case (zfs with no quota enabled), then the Samba code must be patched, for FreeBSD at least. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-234413-227-U1PmmoUbby>