Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:08:53 -0800 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: February 2025 stabilization week Message-ID: <Z74HNZNmQErLb4-1@cell.glebi.us> In-Reply-To: <Z7ycCJIJaSzOtpUK@cell.glebi.us> References: <Z7w1HOUHhWSDZ_hX@cell.glebi.us> <Z7ycCJIJaSzOtpUK@cell.glebi.us>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 08:19:20AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:00:12AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: T> T> This is an automated email to inform you that the February 2025 stabilization week T> T> started with FreeBSD/main at main-n275634-389265e3ca82, which was tagged as T> T> main-stabweek-2025-Feb. T> T> The automatically chosen revision of 389265e3ca82 appeared to be uncompilable. T> By the way, this is my fault. We want to have a builable revision entering T> the stabweek, so I decided to shift the tag to the fixing revision. T> T> The new revision is: f510c5b2135b T> T> Let's start testing of this one. Testing at Netflix did not discover any stability neither performance regressions. Thanks to David dhw@ and Olivier ocochard@! My personal experience with desktop, laptop and home router is also positive. This email thread didn't receive any regression reports. None of the recent bug reports look like a recent regression. Thus, declaring the stabweek closed. The f510c5b2135b proved to be a good one without any cherry-picks. -- Gleb Smirnoff [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQT+rgtjiRzq3LbQ3Nn+/1jAXQXMIgUCZ74HGwAKCRD+/1jAXQXM Iup0AQCV+Wqr7hdPEqfqrQcV7PSNAGLHnwZjVWK9p7Ij08lpugEAjTdFz8mFygqK tqJ7JaJiBl63hOaaBkgUWfsrHMCjzgY= =4XZy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Z74HNZNmQErLb4-1>