Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:23:59 +1100 From: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> To: cem@freebsd.org, "Jonathan T. Looney" <jtl@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r297193 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <56F1F02F.2090900@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpXrxPN4RCo%2B%2BPqnZ1=iHi=RhWN26CYU7Exx8w7HP9VkTQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201603221555.u2MFtHgt068663@repo.freebsd.org> <CAG6CVpXrxPN4RCo%2B%2BPqnZ1=iHi=RhWN26CYU7Exx8w7HP9VkTQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/23/16 10:59, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Jonathan T. Looney <jtl@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Author: jtl >> Date: Tue Mar 22 15:55:17 2016 >> New Revision: 297193 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/297193 >> >> ... >> >> MFC after: 2 weeks > > This change seems like it would be ineligible for a MFC due to > changing the ABI of struct tcpopt. Off the top of my head I can't think of why you would consider struct tcpopt to be part of the ABI. Can you point to any concrete examples demonstrating that it is either explicitly or in a defacto sense? Cheers, Lawrence
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56F1F02F.2090900>