Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 09:28:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Neal Fachan <neal@isilon.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: additional queue macro Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10207040925280.20176-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207031603400.3993-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Neal Fachan wrote: > > > We've got local changes (which I've attached) where the name is > > *_FOREACH_REMOVE. We didn't add reverse removable iterators. Also, the > > temp variable is the second argument. I can't think of a way of doing it > > without having the externally declare the temporary variable. > > > A I like it and you've even done thge man page.. > > *_FOREACH_REMOVE however suggests that it is going to try remove > something.. Instead of potentially changing the existing *_FOREACH behaviour, why not just add *_FOREACH_CHECKED or *_FOREACH_PEDANTIC that adds the desired behaviour. Or *_FOREACH_DEBUG... -- Dan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10207040925280.20176-100000>