Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:45:45 -0500 From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org> To: cokane@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Kai Wang <kaiw@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys param.h src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ranlib Makefile src/usr.bin Makefile Message-ID: <47BDAAB9.6070204@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47BDA6A9.7050006@FreeBSD.org> References: <200802211612.m1LGCkRt044722@repoman.freebsd.org> <47BDA6A9.7050006@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Coleman Kane wrote: > Kai Wang wrote: > >> kaiw 2008-02-21 16:12:46 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/sys param.h >> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar Makefile >> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ranlib Makefile >> usr.bin Makefile >> Log: >> Back out previous commit. Restore Binutils ar as default. Disconnect >> 'BSD' ar to the build. >> >> Requested by: des >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.15 +0 -5 src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar/Makefile >> 1.16 +0 -5 src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ranlib/Makefile >> 1.337 +1 -1 src/sys/sys/param.h >> 1.308 +0 -4 src/usr.bin/Makefile >> >> > What still needs to be done to get this to work? Is it just breaking > under !i386 && !amd64 ? I kind of fancy the idea of slowly replacing > binutils with our own tools. > > -- > Coleman Kane > BTW, I'm not criticizing the choice to back it out, I think that was the right move. I just want to know what "bsdar" and "bsdranlib" are missing... Maybe we can leave the build as-is and default to using the GNU-variants with the make environment, enabling the user to switch over to the BSD-licensed implementations at their choosing. -- Coleman Kane
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47BDAAB9.6070204>