Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 08:40:07 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kerberos 5 (was Re: cvs commit: src/release ...) Message-ID: <20030501134007.GC34089@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030501105905M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <200304301754.h3UHsJ21004574@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030430181603.GD84302@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030501002206.GA30097@madman.celabo.org> <20030501105905M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 10:59:05AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > nectar> Merging Kerberos 5 with the other crypto bits brings it down > nectar> to two, which is quite a blessing. (I really wouldn't mind > nectar> seeing base and crypto merged either.) > > It sounds that Kerberos5 is now combined into 'crypto' distribution, > but: > > nectar> 5.1-RELEASE (and probably the rest of the 5.x series) will > nectar> have Kerberos 5 in the base system. That being the case, > nectar> please, let us not have it as a seperate distribution, and let > nectar> us have it built by default. > > It sounds that Kerberos5 is now combined into 'base' distribution. > > Which is the true one? I apologize -- I was not precise with the terminology. By `base system' I meant the src/ tree ... e.g. FreeBSD itself, not (only) ports. As of _right this moment_, I believe Mark has moved all of the Kerberos bits into the `crypto' dist. That's where we want it for 5.1-RELEASE (as long as a `crypto' dist exists, anyway). Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine . NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030501134007.GC34089>