Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:03:25 -0600 From: Don Wilde <Don@Silver-Lynx.com> To: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: An interesting read... Message-ID: <3B28C42D.3278A85A@Silver-Lynx.com> References: <20010613192426.B1035@superhero.org> <3B28134D.4607540F@acuson.com> <20010614092753.A13828@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > The tests (as usual for lab tests) were not necessarily based on real-life > situations (eg writing etc 10000 files in a directory) but they still give > some hints, and this is all such benchmarks are good for. Once again, we are the victims of "out of the box testing." We must reinforce that FBSD OotB is designed for max stability and ruggedness, noty optimal performance. When you make speed tradeoffs, you lose stability. Not every IT department is smart enough to power their async-mounted net system with a Best Power Level 9... Don Wilde http://www.Silver-Lynx.com Silver Lynx Embedded Microsystems Architects 2218 Southern Bl. Ste. 12 Rio Rancho, NM 87124 505-891-4175 FAX 891-4185 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B28C42D.3278A85A>