Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:29:20 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Johannes Lundberg <johalun0@gmail.com>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: priority of paths to kernel modules? Message-ID: <201808241829.w7OITKON030017@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> of "Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:16:31 -0600." <1535127391.1488.23.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <1535127391.1488.23.camel@freebsd.org>, Ian Lepore writes: > On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 08:35 -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > > My idea, which I implemented locally and should probably create a > > phab review, was to ifdef DRM in modules/Makefile. We could do this > > too. Default not to build/install. > > > > This seems like the obvious fix. I thought the whole point of all this > is that we support drm2 on some platforms, but not x86 anymore. So to > me that implies not building the modules by default on x86. Then we limit it knob to only those platforms we wish to remove it from now. I suggested default off however in a private email I received it was intimated to me that default on for the first while would be better. Personally, I don't care about the minutia but I do care that we have some kind of migration roadmap. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201808241829.w7OITKON030017>