Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:15:51 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/hpfs hpfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/msdosfs msdosfs_denode.csrc/sys/gnu/ext2fssrc/sys/sys vnode.h ... Message-ID: <4224BF67.1070300@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20050301105230.GL3322@submonkey.net> References: <20050228233939.GB81082@elvis.mu.org> <53871.1109636277@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050301093736.GH81082@elvis.mu.org> <20050301105230.GL3322@submonkey.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Ceri Davies wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:37:36AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >>* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> [050228 16:18] wrote: >> >>>The ABI is already broken for filesystem modules as far as I >>>know, but if I'm wrong we can revert it. >> >>I'm not sure you're right but either way progress is good, and 5.x >>needs the work. >> >>How about we play nice after 5.4 or even 5.5 when 5 has more widespread >>adoption? > > > We already told everyone that we wouldn't break for 5.4. > > Ceri All that's been talked about so far with RE with regards to 5.4 is the merging of the fdesk locking, which I believe is complete now. No mention has been made of VFS locking. If there are plans to do that, we need to talk about them right away. Scotthome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4224BF67.1070300>