Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:10:13 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibited ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011201939210.61551-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20001120222330.A66051@skriver.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote: > On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 06:30:04PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Ok, you've got me convinced, it should be implemented. <grumble> > > > > There's a problem, though. Later RFCs say to use 13 instead of 10, as 10 > > was supposed to be for darpa use only. > > My code reacts to all 3. > > > Perhaps you should retest the other OSes and see if they're only responding > > to one of the two messages. > > I could do this, but does it make much difference ? Well, it makes a difference in choosing which code you should have the cisco respond with. Perhaps the other OSes are respecting 13 but not 9 or 10. > > I assume you're using sendmail's "relay if I'm listed as a MX" feature > > right now? > > No, I'm actually using postfix, and a addition I wrote myself, from a > previous email in this thread ... The concept seems well thought out. I suppose what you need to do is continue on with the achking until postfix is happy to be the primary MX and deliver to the backups automatically. Other than that, I can't think of any improvements that would be easy for customers to understand. Sorry for assuming you hadn't put much time into this. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011201939210.61551-100000>