Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:16:08 -0700 From: Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: void <void@f-m.fm> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It's not Rust, it's FreeBSD (and LLVM) Message-ID: <afaa5116b868870c40464082a4c9d55f@bsdforge.com> In-Reply-To: <3845d980-7160-4819-82a4-db2281828c8c@app.fastmail.com> References: <202409031532.483FW0If007252@critter.freebsd.dk> <3845d980-7160-4819-82a4-db2281828c8c@app.fastmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2024-09-08 15:30, void wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2024, at 16:32, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> A FreeBSD system with no installed ports is a rarity today. > > I have 3 such systems. There may be more people running plain systems than > you think. ... > FreeBSD as OS is in that sense incomplete (again IMO). > Why isn't got or git@tiny in base. We used to have svnlite. > > [1] If freebsd goes entirely to pkgbase, would it then really be an OS or > just a distro? (eg 'linux is a kernel') I'm just going to respond to this last bit... It wouldn't be a "distro" in the sense of Linux, as Linux is only a kernel. Whereas (Free)BSD is a complete system. P.S. I know this reply comes late; but I'm catching up on email. :( --Chrishome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?afaa5116b868870c40464082a4c9d55f>