Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:49:13 +0000 From: John Bayly <john.bayly@tipstrade.net> To: FreeBSD-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Clarrification on whether portsnap was affected by the 2012 compromise Message-ID: <50AB6029.4090608@tipstrade.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Regarding the 2012 compromise, I'm a little confused as to what was and wasn't affected: >From the release: > or of any ports compiled from trees obtained via any means other than > through svn.freebsd.org or one of its mirrors Does that mean that any ports updated using the standard "portsnap fetch" may have been affected, I'm guessing yes. Many thanks, John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50AB6029.4090608>