Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:59:52 +0100 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> Subject: Re: Bug about sched_4bsd? Message-ID: <3bbf2fe11001171859h278b7e74p898d219697e3802e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100117195838.GA69278@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20100117.142200.321689433999177718.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20100117.152835.119882392487126976.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20100117195838.GA69278@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/1/17 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 03:28:35PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: >> >> Could you check sched_4bsd.patch, please? >> > > Kohji, > > I do not have the proper skills to evaluate your patch. > Hopefully, one of the scheduler gurus can read over > your analysis and patch, because I use the 4BSD scheduler > on all my systems due to ULE's poor performance. Did you fill any PR with datas or mailed MLs? If yes, can you point to the e-mail reports/PR you did? Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe11001171859h278b7e74p898d219697e3802e>