Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:17:09 -0400 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r264794 - head/release/arm Message-ID: <20140423051709.GY49791@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <71240AD4-7635-4694-950D-CDD99960A013@bsdimp.com> References: <201404230201.s3N21NiE054881@svn.freebsd.org> <11A48119-4502-4EE6-A4AF-E726578380DF@gmail.com> <20140423050923.GW49791@glenbarber.us> <20140423051235.GX49791@glenbarber.us> <71240AD4-7635-4694-950D-CDD99960A013@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--i3QSQnH4pbmkdUT9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:15:14PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:09:23AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:02:03PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >>> Ditto. This should be backed out and you should make whoever broke th= is fix it in head. > >>>=20 > >>=20 > >> Well, this commit only moves where the definition is, from the script > >> itself to the configuration file. > >>=20 > >> But, to be fair, I think you broke it in r264660. > >>=20 > >=20 > > To clarify further, if it was you that did break it in head/, I am not > > complaining about it - I fixed the use case I need. > >=20 > > What I *want* to happen is for the WITH_CLANG_IS_CC and > > WITHOUT_CLANG_IS_CC to stop conflicting with WITH_GCC, and additional > > convoluted and unnecessary knobs to go away. > >=20 > > But you already know that. :) >=20 > Yea, see my recent posts to arm@ on that very topic. CLANG_IS_CC > is evil and must die. There=E2=80=99s too many stupid special cases for > clang in the build system, and it is really horking me off=E2=80=A6 But > there will be fewer in about a week or so when I push my next round > of fixes in... >=20 Feel free to run your changes by me for testing. I'm happy to complain^W test. :) Glen --i3QSQnH4pbmkdUT9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTV0zVAAoJELls3eqvi17Q9NoP+wWjOXBySLRCk/I6KbTpkycs nEbf0peLvRZKfw2GXApyz55oVCR9vdUBEUzbcN0b1SQBGv3IW2w53Eqeer4MuiuN 6baSweLBPUUoLWkUcyr/7cdD8Go9j+iQ9j2MeSKafgYfpgnMGxSJRR6nwu243a51 tgr81K9NdR1loWhH/y+S2KSW97RiatECc6T/QtFN8Srr+u4nmLtaE/4RqDNwEyDR 7dzwEWyr7bRnD0NKCTuQqbAMdXbwB3Phq+s9ZdfMqepvtbKVFArXUuI1hXBCHsFo yBIr1KDPoSnQOOzn6gdby9yEcLLSXrYqTp+cdTuoeZxrVVbe90hKs1veFMwbgBr0 ugMtF9tdDFPRf/HNBJ1thtbJs2rtZukrW5op2R+isGIUzbpnpG3M48Fp5KgY7X8e I0YbuySZAA6l9XTMzftdqFGC5WSgNih1EXmyiRN5M45Be5O4Ue25DW/PXMEIrFaV NBhE5Z9pXaNhDLbhUcnD/ftNlvsQgxIyseTlkA/TIs2QxbwVjRj0y34PT80rjKSy 2MSjeGH5JYrwSuFCwMSZF1Fqnv+k8g7fgldo19CRJBlgqlF/8wD8b7I6fQhM2l0s XkNygMcE3QZ7tsMJwShfFEJM/sLv6RZ2arBQL52shKJEy0bpOZUTOyLoqhIgRg5R WQTkw4LTc2X7dBWV8nbb =hym1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i3QSQnH4pbmkdUT9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140423051709.GY49791>