Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 12:17:47 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/sysinstall install.c label.c options.csysinstall.h Message-ID: <19990822041747.71E921C99@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 18:12:41 MST." <37BF4E89.D3CD53C2@gorean.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Doug wrote: > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > phk 1999/08/05 12:50:27 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > release/sysinstall install.c label.c options.c sysinstall.h > > Log: > > Make the newfs parameters a global option. > > > > The default is still "-b 8192 -f 1024" but my experiments show that > > "-b 16384 -f 4096 -c 100" is a more sensible value for modern > > disksizes. Incidently, I found that using a frag to block ration != 8 was a certain killer for a news filesystem. ie: 8k/1k worked beautifully, and so did 4k/ 0.5k. If I did 4k/1k or 8k/2k, the system would badly trash the file system by corrupting the block allocation bitmaps within 2 or 3 days of running at full load. I was never able to track this down though as it was only occurring on a live system that I wasn't allowed to go back to 4k:1k for debugging once it was working. The 4:1 ratio of 16k/4k rings alarm bells to me.. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990822041747.71E921C99>
