Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 14:44:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: michaelv@MindBender.serv.net (Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com) Cc: sos@sos.freebsd.dk, mal@algonet.se, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lousy disk perf. under cpu load (was IDE vs SCSI) Message-ID: <199709071444.HAA08816@usr09.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199709070407.VAA04801@MindBender.serv.net> from "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" at Sep 6, 97 09:07:02 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >The only advantage with SCSI these days > >seems to be the ability to add more than 4 devices easily, and > >to add them externally of the machine. But then again you have to > >pay solid bucks to get that :) > > Why is it necessary to bring this up over and over again. Because the EIDE folks are bound and determined to pound a stake into the heart of the SCSI "vampire" evry time they see it, whether it's spotted in a coffin somewhere, or sitting on the French Riveria under a beach umbrella sipping Pina Colada's. 8-) 8-). (For the logic-impaired, if it's on the beach in daylight, it's not a vampire) Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709071444.HAA08816>