Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 14:09:14 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, hsu@clinet.fi, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/528 Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.92.960410135638.1152F-100000@freebsd.ki.net> In-Reply-To: <199604101030.UAA15447@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, 10 Apr 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > >Synopsis: slow 386 reports excessive interrupt-level buffer overlows > > >State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > >State-Changed-By: scrappy > >State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 9 21:19:42 PDT 1996 > >State-Changed-Why: > >fixed setting 'options RS_IBUFSIZE=1024', with appropriate > >modifications made to sio.c to allow for this > > Erm. This isn't an acceptable fix. It breaks things unless you also > increase TTYHOG and perhaps some other magic numbers (TTYHOG must be > at least few hundred bytes larger than 2*RS_IBUFSIZE...). > Understood...reopened and responsibility changed to you. After reading this, I had thought that maybe making TTYHOG change with a change in RS_IBUFSIZE might work, except that TTYHOG is also used in relation to at least two other defines that I've found. Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.orghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.92.960410135638.1152F-100000>