Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:49:58 +0000 From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> To: Ulrich =?iso-8859-15?Q?Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@spoerlein.net>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r213398 - head/bin/rm Message-ID: <20101008104958.GA41296@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101008103238.GV65440@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <201010040617.o946HkOO002409@svn.freebsd.org> <20101004092559.GB7322@garage.freebsd.pl> <20101004095845.GA99361@freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1010041435200.95088@woozle.rinet.ru> <20101004104257.GH7322@garage.freebsd.pl> <20101004114248.GA16641@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinoY232bRsut7swz3h-uJ5nXURgG7Tqhn7wGho7@mail.gmail.com> <20101008103238.GV65440@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri Oct 8 10, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Mon, 04.10.2010 at 14:04:53 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > > On 4 October 2010 13:42, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > good point. ZFS should really be added to the list and LFS should go away. are > > > there any other relevant filesystems without a fixed-block size that need to be > > > mentioned? what about afs? or tmpfs? > > > > (it's not that the block sizes aren't fixed, it's that the assignment > > of blocks to the file is not fixed). > > Review of attached patch, anyone? I didn't come up with a clever way to > describe non-COW file systems :/ i like it. personally i'd prefer "which is using a Copy-On-Write strategie." instead of "which is using Copy-On-Write." but that's just personal taste. ;) cheers. alex -- a13x
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101008104958.GA41296>