Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:05:34 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Mathieu Prevot <mathieu_prevot@yahoo.fr> Subject: Re: ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron) Message-ID: <200510281405.36984.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200510281358.06083.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E0323D7B6@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <55E0CA58-AC1E-48E4-A4D0-DDC5829D3690@yahoo.fr> <200510281358.06083.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 28 October 2005 01:58 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 27 October 2005 05:39 pm, Mathieu Prevot wrote: > > I simply added > > > > #define ACPI_MISALIGNED_TRANSFERS > > > > in /usr/src/sys/amd64/include/acpica_machdep.h so the intel > > actypes.h is preserved. > > Maybe it is simpler than touching the Robert's / Intel's code. Is > > it right ? > > If so, someone have to commit it on the CVS sources. Can you do > > it before the release ? > > That's probably a good enough fix for 6.0 for now. HEAD can just > wait for the real fix from Intel and the hack can be removed from > acpica_machdep.h in 6.x after the new Intel code is backported. I agree. Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510281405.36984.jkim>