Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 10:37:53 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: "Mark W. Krentel" <krentel@cs.rice.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: doc-all collection Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970831102818.307A-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199708302244.RAA06204@new-world.cs.rice.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 30 Aug 1997, Mark W. Krentel wrote:
> 1. First, is doc-all like ports-all, where I use tag=. even though
> I use RELENG_2_2 for the sources? For example, the online handbook
Yes. The motivation for moving these docs out of the source tree
was get away from the branches which were a headache because all
three branches needed to be kept in sync.
> 2. I can build and install the docs by cd'ing to /usr/doc/{FAQ,handbook}
> and running "make ; make install". Didn't this used to be part of
> make world when they were in /usr/src/share/doc?
Yes.
> Should it be again?
No. The consumer packaging for these will ultimately be as part
of the ports collection.
> 3. I noticed the CVS repository has /usr/doc/Makefile, but only for
> HEAD. Should there also be a RELENG_2_2 version?
Um... Are you sure the directory there is right? That doesn't
make sense.
-john
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970831102818.307A-100000>