Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:30:01 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net> To: Bill Campbell <freebsd@celestial.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Outlook With FreeBSD IMAP Message-ID: <20070227202827.F49040@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20070227171438.GA14341@ayn.mi.celestial.com> References: <45E25D3A.7070308@chrismaness.com> <20070226124421.X89345@chylonia.3miasto.net> <45E2E578.4080201@ibctech.ca> <45E2F933.5040707@u.washington.edu> <45E38293.6000403@sonicboom.org> <20070227023103.GA31729@ayn.mi.celestial.com> <20070227150304.H8671@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20070227171438.GA14341@ayn.mi.celestial.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I haven't looked at dovecot. Does it maintain a group of listeners, > similar to apache's, to handle incoming requests as courier-imap does? you can set listening IP in config or *, not much more. if i do understand your question. no such many options like apache. > > So far we have had excellent performance with courier-imap at sites with > about 10,000 mail clients hitting a single server (most of whom are using > the POP interface as these are ISP sites). mine has 500-1000 clients, but makes unnoticable load. looks like both are OK.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070227202827.F49040>