Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:13:15 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r222530 - in head: contrib/top usr.bin/top Message-ID: <201106021313.15386.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110602164236.GA95713@freebsd.org> References: <201105311511.p4VFBNnu028827@svn.freebsd.org> <20110602164236.GA95713@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:42:36 pm Alexander Best wrote: > On Tue May 31 11, John Baldwin wrote: > > Author: jhb > > Date: Tue May 31 15:11:23 2011 > > New Revision: 222530 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222530 > > > > Log: > > Add a new option to toggle the display of the system idle process (per-CPU > > idle threads). The process is displayed by default (subject to whether or > > not system processes are displayed) to preserve existing behavior. The > > system idle process can be hidden via the '-z' command line argument or the > > 'z' key while top is running. When it is hidden, top more closely matches > > the behavior of FreeBSD <= 4.x where idle time was not accounted to any > > process. > > does it make sense to have the -z flag and "z" key available, when the -S > flag or the "S" key was not specified? I view them as independent just as 'i' and 'S' are. I'm not sure it's worth trying to make it fancier as none of the other keys are dependent on another mode. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106021313.15386.jhb>