Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 17:36:53 -0400 From: David Sledge <dsledge@appriss.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) Message-ID: <44D26C75.10506@appriss.com> In-Reply-To: <20060803085048.GB14727@vision.anyware> References: <970c0a6b0607312222j54352929i829de592c6d704fa@mail.gmail.com> <20060801075213.GA70025@vision.anyware> <44CF9A25.7030504@appriss.com> <20060801222049.GA995@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <44CFE6AA.40204@appriss.com> <20060802083723.GB91663@vision.anyware> <44D0C2EA.6050902@appriss.com> <20060802152403.GB93647@vision.anyware> <44D0C6EB.7010806@appriss.com> <44D0CFD9.2000408@appriss.com> <20060803085048.GB14727@vision.anyware>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
I compiled, installed and ran your port successfully.
However, you pass ${LOCALBASE}/diablo-jdk1.5.0 to Eclipse build.
How do you know the diablo jdk is installed? You better use
${JAVA_HOME} instead.
Fixed
If you want to force using the Diablo JDK and not the bsdjava one,
specify JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd in the Makefile. That would maybe be
safer as I experienced build failures when using jdk-1.5.0p2_3
instead of diablo-jdk-1.5.0.06.00.
Fixed - great idea
Another question: do you really mean to be the maintainer of
Eclipse? That may be a lot of work, be prepared to receive a
reasonable number of PRs ;-)
I thought I would give it a try and see how it goes. I figured better
to try and maintain it if possible instead of it being another port
out there without a maintainer. Is it really a bad idea to do this?
Please let me know and I will change it back before I submit it. I
know I will get requests and questions but since I have not been
watching the mailing list that long I have no idea how many PRs or
problems come in for eclipse. The Current "Problem Report List" on
FreeBSD's website only shows 4 PRs when searching for eclipse. That is
why I thought it would be manageable. Please let me know if I am
getting in over my head?
Just a last one: why are you commenting out the MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME
and following line in eclipse startup script? Just curious.
All the best,
From what I could find this was a workaround to make mozilla, or I
believe firefox really, work for eclipse 3.1.2 or earlier on linux and
unix systems . If you leave it enabled for eclipse 3.2 it results in
the following error when hovering the mouse over a class in the
editor, like "String" for example.
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/home/<home-dir>/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/
configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/91/1/.cp/libswt-mozilla-gtk-3232.so: Und
efined symbol "NS_InitEmbedding"
I found one more problem when looking under the "manage configuration" window f
or the Eclipse Platform Plug-in resource. That has now been fixed. The eclipse.
shar file has been updated on the web site at [1]http://www.freshdevonrails.com
/eclipse.shar . I think that we got it this time. I have not seen or heard of a
ny more problems.
References
1. http://www.freshdevonrails.com/eclipse.shar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44D26C75.10506>