Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:57:44 +0200 From: John Angelmo <john@adminforum.se> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: __fpclassifyd problem Message-ID: <3F92FAC8.9070300@adminforum.se> In-Reply-To: <20031019204629.GC49466@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <3F92E129.10307@veidit.net> <20031019204629.GC49466@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 09:08:25PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote: > >>Hello >> >>I'm trying to install java-checkstyle on my 5.1 system, the system is >>upto date (p10) but I get this build error: >> >>===[root] /usr/ports/java/java-checkstyle # make >>===> Extracting for java-checkstyle-3.1 >> >>>>Checksum OK for checkstyle-src-3.1.tar.gz. >> >>===> Patching for java-checkstyle-3.1 >>===> java-checkstyle-3.1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ant - found >>===> java-checkstyle-3.1 depends on file: >>/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.3.1/bin/java - found >>===> Configuring for java-checkstyle-3.1 >>===> Building for java-checkstyle-3.1 >>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol >>"__fpclassifyd" >>*** Error code 1 >> >>Stop in /usr/ports/java/java-checkstyle. >> >> >>What I understand is that the problem is that I can have some stale libs >>in /usr/lib >>how can I solve this? > > > This symbol is defined in libc.so.5. One way you can see this problem > is if you are running a 4.x binary that links to libm.so.2 on a 5.x > system, because libm has the same version number in 5.x but is not > binary compatible. So the 4.x binary links to libc.so.4 and > libm.so.2, and the latter is actually a 5.x library that expects to > have __fpclassifyd resolved by linking with libc.so.5. Is it the case > on your system that you have old 4.x binaries installed? > Yes I upgraded from 4.8 to 5.1 I now have compat4 installed to /John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F92FAC8.9070300>