Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Aug 1996 13:55:04 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
To:        richards@herald.net (Richard Stanford)
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Adaptec 2940UW / Barracuda problems?
Message-ID:  <199608121855.NAA08814@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91.960809193217.72224A-100000@dev.dsc.dalsys.com> from "Richard Stanford" at Aug 9, 96 07:36:21 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Sorry to bug the list with a compatability question, but:
> 
>   My hardware vendor recently told me that the Adaptec 2940UW cards
>   I was planning on putting in my new FreeBSD servers would not work
>   properly with my ST15150N Barracudas.  Have any of y'all had any
>   experience with this combination?

YES...  KEEP THEM COOL!

>   Also, from ISP experience, are any of you using the faster 4GB
>   Barracudas?  Are they worth it?

Other than the fact that I often end up pulling them out and replacing
them with 2 x ST32550N for speed?  :-)  (two mechanisms are faster than
one).

>   Thanks for the information, folks.  Oh, I was also planning on
>   using ST32155 2GB Hawks for the system disks - anyone had any
>   problems with these?

Got a couple dozen of the 31055's, I think one infant death, faster at 
some operations than the Barra's.  Only been using them for about three 
months however.  NICE drives, from what I can tell, would not hesitate 
to recommend them to a friend.  I would project the same results to
the 32155's.  ;-)

... Joe

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator			      jgreco@ns.sol.net
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI			   414/546-7968



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608121855.NAA08814>