Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 03:10:15 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/init Makefile src/libexec/rtld-elf Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105310306060.19573-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20010529163749.A30158@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:18:14PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Mon, 28 May 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > ru 2001/05/28 09:58:36 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > sbin/init Makefile > > > libexec/rtld-elf Makefile > > > Log: > > > Use new backup feature of install(1). > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.26 +2 -8 src/sbin/init/Makefile > > > 1.15 +2 -15 src/libexec/rtld-elf/Makefile > > > > Do we really want these backups? Note that the backup for init never > > actually worked in any committed version, because the existence test > > was done before bsd.prog.mk is included, so some of the variables in > > it were not set. > > > Why not? We do have init.bak listed in init_main.c:init_path[]. That's almost a reason :-). If our "secure" (schg'ed) init somehow doesn't work, then we fall back to insecure ones. But this is really another bug. > And yes, I have noticed that the backups for init(8) did not work because > make(1) resolves exists() the first time it parses it, and BINDIR is only > defined after bsd.prog.mk is included. This means that no one except the PR submitter has every used it. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0105310306060.19573-100000>