Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:16:00 -0800 (PST) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: .sujournal strangeness after (?) upgrading to 10-STABLE Message-ID: <1390911360834-5880684.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Unfortunately, I had my first reboot. Not trusting journal (I've enabled it on all filesystems some time ago) I did full few fscks between reboots in single user mode. Unsurprisingly, there were some inconsistencies in / and /var _but_ checking tunefs -p, actually SU+J was disabled there (on all other filesystems it was still enabled)! I don't know how that happened, previously I just didn't trust SU+J enough and did fsck anyway, I hope that explains inconsistencies. For some time I couldn't enable SU+J again, because of .sujournal actaully present both in / and /var - so there was evidence I really enabled it but somehow it disabled itself? Anyway, using chflags 0 I've removed both journals and after fsck was successful in enabling both journals again by tunefs -j enable (/ after a reboot with "read only fs modified" error). However, that new journals (initial ones were created somewhere on 9-STABLE I think) bear an actual date of enabling them- in difference to the old ones, that have just a start of Unix epoch (1970). Is it intended behaviour? /tmp $ ls -lioF .sujournal 3 -r-------- 1 root wheel schg,sunlnk,nodump,opaque 33554432 1 sty 1970 .su /tmp $ cd /var /var $ ls -lioF .sujournal 4 -r-------- 1 root wheel schg,sunlnk,nodump,opaque 33554432 28 sty 02:06 .su -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/sujournal-strangeness-after-upgrading-to-10-STABLE-tp5880684.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1390911360834-5880684.post>