Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:56:53 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20090313155653.GA53926@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <49BA52D2.8090209@FreeBSD.org> References: <200903120954.n2C9s2ev063133@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090313023956.GA49511@dragon.NUXI.org> <49BA52D2.8090209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >>> osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> Modified files: >>> shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist Log: >>> Fix pkg-plist. >>> Bump PORTREVISION. >> Thanks for fixing the PLIST (much appreciated), but why did you bump >> PORTREVISION for a PLIST change? >> There is zero reason to force a reinstall for a PLIST change. Either the >> port is already installed (and the user can wait for some other reason to >> update), or the port isn't installed and bumping PORTREVISION does >> nothing. > > It's needed for package cluster, otherwise it does not know to rebuild and > will serve incomplete package forever. Did it used to parts commit emails and rebuild based on them? Or did we used to just rebuild all packages quite often? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090313155653.GA53926>