Date: 12 May 1998 21:53:03 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>, peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), pete@sms.fi, net@FreeBSD.ORG, core@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD Message-ID: <xzpk97r6zc0.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Tue, 12 May 1998 11:31:42 -0700" References: <2990.894997902@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> writes: > I appreciate that people's time is limited, especially for > bleeding-edge issues like IPv6, but perhaps a working group could be > formed at this point to go actually study the various options far more > substantially before we move on to the stage of talking seriously > about committing anything? That is indeed a good idea. I have myself little experience with IPv6 - though I plan to get some fast :) - but my general impression is that the INRIA stack is, for the time being, better than the WIDE stack, but that the WIDE stack is catching up. Also, the packaging of the WIDE stack is such that integrating it into FreeBSD would be far less work than integrating the INRIA stack (amongst other things, it is much better documented, and is distributed as a set of patches rather than a collection of replacement files). Then again, the INRIA stack is being developed in France, so naturally I am slightly partial to it ;) -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk97r6zc0.fsf>