Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 01:44:39 +0100 (CET) From: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: zero copy code review Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10012070143120.30687-100000@login-1.eunet.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012051623180.9538-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Just about the only thing that may be considered is changing the > name of M_WAIT to something more appropriate, if it means so much to the > majority of people (honestly, I would find even doing this a waste of > time, but if lots of folks think it's worth educating kernel developers > by changing the name of a flag, then we might as well). This isn't much of an issue for me; however, I'd vote for changing the name. Not so much for "educating kernel developers", but rather for the sake of us being consistent and labelling things correctly. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10012070143120.30687-100000>