Date: Wed, 02 Jul 1997 23:28:46 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP and CVS branches: bug? Message-ID: <199707030528.XAA02164@pluto.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Jul 1997 22:45:51 MDT." <199707030445.WAA29217@rocky.mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I disagree. There are many 'technical' features that CVS gives us that >aren't available in Perforce, or are done in a much different fashion. >That, and the documentation is pretty non-existant. When I >reviewed/evaluated Perforce for work, the lack of decent documentation >was my final sticking point, and even the developers agreed that it >needed work. (Though, they were real good about providing specific >answers to specific questions I had regarding the product, but that >doesn't work well with a bunch of developers who are fairly naive when >it comes to SCM's). > >That was last Fall, so things may have changed since then. There is a 100+ page manual now that is very well written. We've been using Perforce at Pluto since February and I wouldn't even think for a moment about going back to CVS. >Nate > -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707030528.XAA02164>