Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 01:59:00 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BootFORTH - demo floppy Message-ID: <81120.914234340@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Dec 1998 01:25:21 PST." <199812210925.BAA09284@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> see I case here. It's not "tradition". It is the ANS Forth standard. If you > want an evaluate which works with null-terminated strings, go ahead and defin e > evaluate0 or something. But needlessly making it incompatible with a publishe d > standard is, well, it is stupid. Which is what I hopefully communicated in my other message. Mike is not a forth programmer, so he simply does not always know the distinction between something which is a standard core word and something which is an optional (and perhaps egregious) forth-ism. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81120.914234340>