Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:58:39 -0500 From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net> To: David Boyd <David.Boyd@insightbb.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new dialog/libdialog testing Message-ID: <20110209215839.GA16262@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <OJEBKOFDEOADELCOBJCGEEFHDKAA.David.Boyd@insightbb.com> References: <OJEBKOFDEOADELCOBJCGEEFHDKAA.David.Boyd@insightbb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:28:53AM -0500, David Boyd wrote: > Having some time to test 9.0-CURRENT with the new dialog command has > uncovered only one major omission (for us): prgbox/dialog_prgbox. >=20 > This is used in most (if not all) of our installation/management scripts. >=20 > Was prgbox omitted for any particular reason? >=20 > I realize that change is inevitable. >=20 > Is there a better approach to running a program in a window? >=20 > We like many of the new features presented, but are wary of problems down > the road due to the omission of prgrbox. >=20 > I notice that sysinstall uses dialog_prgbox in 8.1-RELEASE. I've had that widget (and a few others - tree and build-list) on my to-do list for a while, but don't recall noticing that the unimplemented ones were used much. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFNUw4OtIqByHxlDocRAiOrAJ9hJwmVm3e1t1jngT3BOluvXxrV3QCeNzoU KZ6+eH23XvkIY7Mo0+MxcKU= =9HNy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110209215839.GA16262>