Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:32:04 +0200 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> To: Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Scott Ullrich <sullrich@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NAT-T on current 8 Message-ID: <20090604093204.GA94385@zeninc.net> In-Reply-To: <4A278950.8010802@zirakzigil.org> References: <4A205679.5030406@zirakzigil.org> <d5992baf0905291456k3078e921t74012d354bd6abc6@mail.gmail.com> <20090531134541.H3234@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4A278950.8010802@zirakzigil.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:44:00AM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote: [....] > Sorry for late feedback, very little time on my hands... Hi. > I've tried to interoperate with an old version of ipsec-tools (0.6.7) > and it takes a long time to start working, but it does in the end. > I didn't have much time to try anything more in-depth, but I'll keep > you posted. Do you mean "with an ipsec-tools 0.6.7 as the peer" ? It should work, as changes are only in the kernel/userland interface, and as (AFAIR) no changes have been done in the way NAT-T is negociated with the peer between ipsec-tools 0.6 and 0.7. Could you please give us more informations about that ? And what do you mean by "it takes some time to start working" ??? Thanks, Yvan.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090604093204.GA94385>