Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:27:24 +0100 From: pooka@redbrick.dcu.ie (Tiny Non Cats) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: On TCP sequence numbers Message-ID: <19990823102724.A13469@mother.redbrick.dcu.ie> In-Reply-To: <199908201427.QAA02524@hangdog.is.co.za>; from Geoff Rehmet on Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:27:44PM %2B0200 References: <199908201427.QAA02524@hangdog.is.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Geoff Rehmet ]
> Another question that comes in to this is - how good a tool is nmap
> for evaluating the predictability of the sequence numbers we generate?
Just a funny (?) aside - while playing about with nmap here a while back,
a colleague accidentally discovered that our Digital (or Compaq Tru64, if you
want to be perverse) Unix 4.0E box was using a constant (?!) sequence
number.
Cian
--
What think ye of Christ? Whose son is he? Will you, like Peter, boldly say:
"Who?"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990823102724.A13469>