Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:42:35 -0700 From: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> To: hackers@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: more pkgbase reviewers required Message-ID: <3536ba2d-ada0-4ebe-8e20-da94c9bc6fea@nomadlogic.org> In-Reply-To: <acPbI7THuJb5h4pp@amaryllis.le-fay.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 3/25/26 05:54, Lexi Winter wrote: > hello, > > at this point, it's extremely difficult to get any pkgbase-related > changes reviewed in Phabricator, which is an issue since we're now > pushing pkgbase as the default method for installing the system. > > if you have some spare time to help with this, please consider adding > yourself to the #pkgbase project on Phabricator and helping with some > outstanding reviews. > > some examples of typical pkgbase reviews (some of which are now reviewed > since i complained about this elsewhere): > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D55645 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D55630 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54542 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54540 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D54282 > > i appreciate that this sort of install/upgrade stuff is boring and > not sexy, but it is important to users, and it's difficult to find > any motivation to contribute to the project when no one else seems > to care. do you need to have a commit bit to be a useful reviewer. willing to test but was never sure how useful my input was on phabricator since i'm just a user/admin. -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.orghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3536ba2d-ada0-4ebe-8e20-da94c9bc6fea>