Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:45:08 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk Message-ID: <20060425004405.G44618@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060424202859.GA18457@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060423193208.N1187@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060423201732.GA74905@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060424091803.L20593@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424215650.P36233@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424181531.GA13774@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425001751.S44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424202859.GA18457@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> > I'll try to build DDB kernel tomorrow evening to check. Which commands should I KK> > issue in ddb ? KK> KK> 'show lockedvnods', 'ps' and 'alltrace' are important. Last note: are these lines added enough? Or some are unneeded? options KDB options KDB_TRACE options KDB_UNATTENDED options DDB options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT options WITNESS Thanks. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060425004405.G44618>