Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:47:24 -0800
From:      Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Portversion claims a newer port is available but it ain't so
Message-ID:  <20050116074724.GA72796@0lsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050116041659.GA62683@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <20050116013239.GA84616@0lsen.net> <20050116041659.GA62683@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 15, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> But the ports tree *does* have 1.1.0_4.  You probably did 'make
> fetchindex', which works against the latest ports tree.  cvsup and you'll
> get the update.

Actually, I didn't do a make fetchindex, but it seems as if portversion
does this at times.  At any rate, you were right.  Running cvsup pulls down
the latest port.

-Clint



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050116074724.GA72796>