Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:21:45 +0000 From: Kirill Ponomarev <kp@krion.cc> To: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net> Cc: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Salt on 2026Q3 Message-ID: <alUeqewfV1eYyuST@krion.cc> In-Reply-To: <a3717102-ef40-4c4f-ab34-6a8aaedc00c2@fechner.net> References: <edc098db-041d-47f2-b3d6-c145c92a8725@netfence.it> <alSMIuyOUs8fRq5D@krion.cc> <0916dbf2-0ab3-4e58-b651-e239fedbd433@fechner.net> <alSfGCHrcnG0z4Di@krion.cc> <428e6bd9-7b9c-4769-96d3-9bb1c2974b2e@fechner.net> <alUHhVTKljwfOrdX@krion.cc> <fa06c6b3-3a1e-4ffa-95fe-2f2b3ace1843@fechner.net> <a3717102-ef40-4c4f-ab34-6a8aaedc00c2@fechner.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 07/13, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> it is pulled in by the last line in salt:
>
> ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http>0:devel/py-opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http@${PY_FLAVOR}
> which brings in:
> GCP_AUTH_RUN_DEPENDS= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}opentelemetry-exporter-credential-provider-gcp>=0.59b0:devel/py-opentelemetry-exporter-credential-provider-gcp@${PY_FLAVOR}
> Which brings in:
> ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}google-auth>=2.25:security/py-google-auth@${PY_FLAVOR
> which then pulls:
> AIOHTTP_RUN_DEPENDS=
> ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}aiohttp>=3.8.0<4.0.0:www/py-aiohttp@${PY_FLAVOR}
> Maybe you set some custom options to disable that or do you not use that
> patch?
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=272214&action=diff
You're right, I'd checked with make run-depends-list, which only
shows direct deps, so I missed the transitive pull. When I tested the
patch on 2026-06-28, the tree had py-aiohttp-3.13.5_1, which compiles
fine under python 3.14. On 2026-07-08 sunpoet bumped aiohttp to
3.14.1 and that version doesn't build against python 3.14, probably
it's an upstream bug. You can disable the GCP_AUTH option on
devel/py-opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http in your set, that
drops the whole google-auth/aiohttp subtree and lets the build
proceed I guess.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFPBAABCAA5FiEEJCHRFhEAQujKni1pDyI9/LMCykUFAmpVHqkbFIAAAAAABAAO
bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwzAAoJEA8iPfyzAspFpBgH/2Z52AvN0MYbxwzN2ccn
5KBEeJTLqiUBw/S58oKEi0O22ZmL0CHdGVP56Qo7LYotfjCT7zffm7xwizw0s08t
w3gIVOYhit2VZ4SNJXy7WQqJLWlsZnKz1fxcGzGIoRS6vGv7MOW5Azx0JzdHyYq6
W4A6ZrWpuppmaz7Mh0qlYx1jvOikXIdgN0SdhOpyIbGobBL8vP0mW6k2hVlFWbau
+0FnZbzYUYwk0s3fDP5l06ASeYhdlbGAiXjjHjyjBRjRU4cJNCulA/c6v1LXOuMz
rhziaM3sSwuDsAaX9kcZZiZgWhdfdxSNaheFfSm9tHhFJPoRRwvCUSmFE7qwtDHX
Su8=
=QJK3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alUeqewfV1eYyuST>