Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:24:01 +0400 From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA_=F3=C9=D7=C1=DE=C5=CE=CB=CF?= <mitya@yandex-team.ru> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports] cvs commit: ports/www/links Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <4EA012E1.20503@yandex-team.ru> In-Reply-To: <20111020071954.GA87648@FreeBSD.org> References: <201110191549.p9JFnaKx050548@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111019154946.C5E2410657CA@hub.freebsd.org> <20111020062559.GV95451@FreeBSD.org> <20111020071954.GA87648@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20.10.2011 11:19, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:26:00AM +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 03:49:46PM +0000, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >>> demon 2011-10-19 15:49:36 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> www/links Makefile distinfo >>> Log: >>> revert back to 2.3-pre2 until I fix IPv6 patch (probably tomorrow). >> >> Hmm, what about bump PORTEPOCH? > > Perhaps Dmitry wanted to avoid bumping it since the fix was done relatively > fast (within an hour). In this case, PORTEPOCH can be left intact. > > ./danfe Yes, indeed, I thought it is clear that I revert it rather fast so it does not deserve PORTEPOCH bump. Sorry for the confusion.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA012E1.20503>