Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:50:51 +0200
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r258672 - in head: . share/mk
Message-ID:  <20131127075051.GU59496@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <52959276.7070803@wemm.org>
References:  <201311270454.rAR4sOqI004103@svn.freebsd.org> <20131127050358.GG1710@glenbarber.us> <52959276.7070803@wemm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ryZWRk5DZTcwGpL9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:34:30PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On 11/26/13, 9:03 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:54:24AM +0000, Peter Wemm wrote:
> >> Author: peter
> >> Date: Wed Nov 27 04:54:23 2013
> >> New Revision: 258672
> >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258672
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>   At great personal risk, change the default for LIB32 from yes to no.=
  As
> >>   mentioned in UPDATING, you can even do it as an as-needed operation =
after
> >>   doing a buildworld/installworld.  You can set WITH_LIB32=3Dyes in ma=
ke.conf
> >>   or src.conf.
> >>
> >=20
> > Thank you.  Long overdue, IMHO.
> >=20
> > Glen
> >=20
>=20
> A slightly longer explanation of what I was thinking:
>=20
> - There's a new round of 'make -j' problems lurking in there.  We are
> missing chunks of the ordering glue that cause libraries to be built in t=
he
> right order when they depend on each other.
> - It's a waste of cpu time for the usual case, particularly for the 11.x
> cycle for the next 1-2 years.
Why ?

> - We don't build them properly - we invent cpu flags etc.
What do you mean there ?  Do you reference the fact that lib32 build on
amd64 assumes sse2 and all previous coprocessor extensions ?

>=20
> The usual use case for 32 bit binaries seems to be:
> - running a 32 bit chroot or jail - this is unaffected.
> - running old binaries, usually from 4.x or 6.x when the 64 bit port was
> really green - WITH_LIB32 doesn't actually help much with this because mo=
st
> of the libraries are missing.
>=20
> It seems more likely we can do a better job with packages.  With some
> massaging, we should be able to use the compat-6.x/i386 libraries as-is, =
and
> solve the "old 4.x/6.x binary" issue in one go.
>=20
> However, ld-elf32.so.1 does require special handling.  I have something in
> mind that might make this moot though.
>=20
> I suspect I've made the powerpc folks angry though...

I disagree with the change. It was not discussed, and the motivation
presented ('the build has bugs') is not valid for removing a useful
feature.

All other OSes I am aware of implement multi-arch fully. For 10/11, we
have quite good compat32 layer for non-managing interfaces, and have
user-mode compilation environment. I think that the route to go forward
is to have multi-arch for ports, or at least, enable to have 32bit ports
installation on 64bit host.

I think that this is step backward.

--ryZWRk5DZTcwGpL9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSlaRaAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1BSNsP/iK+Ag9IsZh0i35y7nG8K2wd
lg/L+qgL8bH2DWuNZMwhHQwM79M/C80w8jF0x9AWBZp8Y3RQwdNzecYnbPQbJ4v7
2xU9j8FyHgVYROwp8oTwKlZLltbrXlb0RfafFCas57eRFOq+m9OyncxITYwhucBS
mWxuLyqaliBWDiI1ErFmPXhygsEEaCV74lZmZlIpXeeLt6HKG2K5nSsEZNUbRbVB
tEjr/MroIHTQXeir7N8IHCkupuAoXfpKtYWaHhStcPVXcHIicBsvn9SnGRZv1joL
w3WCe/Sb2k+i1fzuwr/UHesFqxO/4LjXkMWrwWxv+NMr4ChnJJgxFLDI/4qo1qNx
xbWkL9u0gkJdZF/LCgHueJ6to52JM3yOnzrDl7sNnStua7kn7OD6fchKTZBz1LTx
EpqNBKwNEFJdOAlEBWYAH1H3Y1YtCsslF0GnanlA+Gi9kG6ymOL62SsxBhZSg2pJ
GhCazNYBviwSc4Ji+tu8ftURRPGRS6vIC73rlpdLjVbFHBMqqTkQuHcTGWb2duXC
IciEoloMPnb/QwvWU7Zj7mKBDwfwDmiXKDN4CfanFEShgU5BMWhAQmifBBaX4GMy
AEaIaGG8o1mH092S411MRwwGNMexDVxdxTPwj3e4kJOYHXomxvUalt5Ooh3r2YDA
FQEG5pbkwwxcfiY2AihL
=RwfC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ryZWRk5DZTcwGpL9--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131127075051.GU59496>