Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 09:42:31 +0200 (MET DST) From: Per Fogelstrom & <per.fogelstrom@mbox200.swipnet.se> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Cc: dyson@freebsd.org, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com>, downsj@teeny.org, ache@nagual.ru, dg@root.com, gritton@byu.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org, misc@openbsd.org, pefo@pica.opsycon.se Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/db/hash hash_buf.c Message-ID: <ML-2.3.845710951.1575.pefo@pica> In-Reply-To: <9517.845708641@critter.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <199610190650.BAA02780@dyson.iquest.net>, "John S. Dyson" > writes: >> > Additionally, that "fix" was simply the wrong thing to do, > and there are >> > better ways to deal with the problem. If the zeroing the > buffer in db >> > was typical of the ways that others are "fixing" security, > well... Sad... > :-(. > >> > >> Ah John, ever eager to continue a flame war aren't you. > >> > >Please refer to the message that I commented on... I am NOT flaming, > >simply stating an outsiders view of the unsubstantiated OpenBSD position. > >BTW, what flame war? Why are you bringing flamage up? > > > > Because obviously Theo is Very Proud of his fix :-) > Geezz, couldn't keep away from the keyboard ehh? Grow up.....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ML-2.3.845710951.1575.pefo>