Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:17:37 +0100 From: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> To: Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r277610 - in head: bin/ln lib/libc/include lib/libc/sys share/man/man4 sys/compat/freebsd32 sys/kern sys/sys usr.bin/kdump Message-ID: <20160107201737.GA51187@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20160107130325.GA62399@chd.heemeyer.club> References: <201501232107.t0NL79a8099736@svn.freebsd.org> <20160107130325.GA62399@chd.heemeyer.club>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:03:25PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:07:09PM +0000, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > > Author: jilles > > Date: Fri Jan 23 21:07:08 2015 > > New Revision: 277610 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277610 > > Log: > > Add futimens and utimensat system calls. > > The core kernel part is patch file utimes.2008.4.diff from > > pluknet@FreeBSD.org. I updated the code for API changes, added the manual > > page and added compatibility code for old kernels. There is also audit and > > Capsicum support. > > A new UTIME_* constant might allow setting birthtimes in future. > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1426 > > Submitted by: pluknet (partially) > > Reviewed by: delphij, pluknet, rwatson > > Relnotes: yes > any chances that it will be merged to 10? if not, can I merge kernel > part only? I don't plan an MFC because I don't think the trouble of not being able to run a binary compiled on a newer stable/10 on an older stable/10 is worth it. I have no objection to a partial MFC that does not expose the new functions to build systems of ports and other third party software. -- Jilles Tjoelker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160107201737.GA51187>