Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:56:14 -0800 From: Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: ml-freebsd-stable Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Subject: Re: HPN-SSH question Message-ID: <CAN6yY1u%2BHzxVhtMDWyHbZegeJssoycYTZWtwKdv_UM9F=bRb6A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1196DEC9-2AEE-4F9A-8521-EFA8513D6003@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <9728B37F7A4EBE45A2FD4B18883BAED6D02612@SN2PRD0802MB111.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <BE96C8EC5CEB4411BAA45D9A5882CDAB@multiplay.co.uk> <A6AFCC97-74FE-4B9E-8B9E-B245909D944E@lists.zabbadoz.net> <40A76FC1992140AFA5B8EB52C28DB3A1@multiplay.co.uk> <1196DEC9-2AEE-4F9A-8521-EFA8513D6003@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote: > > > Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably > > reduced transfer rates on high latency links, exactly the opposite > > as one would expect. I don't have the exact figures I'm afraid as > > we just went straight back to standard ssh. > > > > I'll try and get some time to retest and provide some proper > > results. > > Thanks. If you do please try the bundled version in 8-STABLE or 9 and > also gather the usual meta data (latency, packet loss, IPv4/v6, any > socket buffer tuning, ...). > And, if it happens with 9, any chance of a tcpdump capture of all of the headers for analysis? (No packet data needed.) We use the HPN version extensively on high latency links (often trans-oceanic) and have never seen that. I'd find running tcptrace and generating time plots very useful for looking at this sort of performance issue. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6558@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1u%2BHzxVhtMDWyHbZegeJssoycYTZWtwKdv_UM9F=bRb6A>