Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:13:04 -0800
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates ffs_softdep.c src/sy 
Message-ID:  <200001122113.NAA58059@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:08:01 MST." <200001122108.OAA16552@harmony.village.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> In message <83336.947711064@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
> : In message <200001122101.OAA16486@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes:
> : >In message <200001121911.LAA57020@rah.star-gate.com> Amancio Hasty writes:
> : >: No need to get that fancy and besides such language will probably 
> : >: be too complicated to the describe . I would just have the X server load
> : >: a kernel module with the given code and state variables so that another
> : >: kernel module can restore the graphics context . 
> : >
> : >That is one way.  The language idea wouldn't be too bad if it was in
> : >ACPI's binary language, since tools exist to create that and interpret 
> : >that once we have ACPI in the kernel...
> : 
> : I belive OS/2 already ha{d|ve} a script language for this.  Check any
> : video driver floppy for a moderately advanced graphics card.
> 
> I think you are right about this.  I think ACPI might be a better
> target language since it could be the basis for a general "on panic,
> run these hooks before switching to the debugger" interface.  However, 
> I can't think of much other than the video cards that would need this
> level of complexity.  IIRC, video chips on the mobo do have a 'reset'
> option, but I'm away from my paper spec and can't say for sure.

I agree with Warner now if people can come up with other uses for
an "ACPI" language then I guess is okay ;however, for just restoring
vga graphic's state I think that I would find it hard to justify bolting
an interpreter in the kernel . 

With respect to languages describing vga, yes there are precedence of this
type of technology for instance Thomas Roell a while back invented
his own language. 

I do feel that this type of discussion is best carried out in the XFree86
mailing list ..






-- 

 Amancio Hasty
 hasty@rah.star-gate.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001122113.NAA58059>